Hi Bryan: I, for one, believe you have interpreted the rules in each case (and I think "no" for the dead friends question) the same way I would. Also leads me to think "correctly", but that's a matter of interpretation, so I'm interested to see if any others disagree. -Joe > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on lists.looneylabs.com > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 > X-Original-To: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivered-To: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:54:27 -0400 > From: "Bryan Stout" <bryan.stout@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-priority: Normal > Subject: [Fluxx] Zombie Fluxx rules questions > X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 > X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.45889 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.00 BSF_SC0_TG035a Message contains invalid style definition >