Hmm. I didn't know there was an Eco list. That seems to be where
the discussion belongs. :) I'll take my comments there.
On Jan 28, 2007, at 1:34 PM, ginohn wrote:
I posted a couple rebuttals, but to the Eco list.
If you'd like, I'll copy them here.
:-j
On Jan 28, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Christopher Hickman wrote:
I've been waiting for somebody to chime in about Andy's latest
Wunderland Weekly News, regarding the fallacy of (paper)
recycling, so I could add my thoughts. I try to be careful about
posting political issues now. ;)
Since nobody else is, I'll start the discussion.
I try to buy products with recyclable packaging, and I recycle
everything I can. The overall volume of my recyclables generally
meets or exceeds that of my refuse from the same time period. I
recycle not just because I thought it was the right thing to do,
but because I pay for my trash collection by volume, and I pay for
recycling whether I use it or not (through my county taxes). So
if recycling paper is bad for the environment, my local government
is adding insult to injury by making me pay (just in terms of tax
money, as our recycling is non-sorted) for that harm. (Though I am
wholly unsurprised that a government program has the exact
opposite effect as its intent. That's pretty standard, really.
Is prohibition making drugs less available?)
Topher
_______________________________________________
Something mailing list
Something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/something
_______________________________________________
Something mailing list
Something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/something