On 3/5/07, Carl Worth <cworth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What's surprising in the current discussion is that people have only been looking to the three published sizes here for canonical information: http://www.wunderland.com/icehouse/MakingIcehouse.html
The real problem there is that 0 pips is just too darn small. Any of the methods given here give solutions that are withing hundredths of an inch of each other. We all could claim that the new 0 size makes us right, but my hacksaw+beltsander+micrometer might end up being different from your h+b+m and we're both still right because it's not an exact science. -- - |) () /\/ Wouldn't you all agree though that 7ths of an inch are just awesome?