I suppose that is up to the person enterign the response, it appears that 2 entries so far use existing languages and 1 entry is broken in some way. >From the webpage: "You may pick any programming or patching language you wish, and may stretch the definition of 'programming language' and 'software' if you like." Doesn't actually mention _computers_ at all, it seems. > -----Original Message----- > From: something-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:something-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Christopher Hickman > Sent: 22 April 2008 17:57 > To: something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Something] FW: [Openlab] instructionset > > I'm going to have to go with "WTF?" on this one. I just don't get it. > > Are you supposed to make up a programming language to code > that vague idea? > > On Tuesday, April 22, 2008, at 07:16AM, "Atwood, Robert C" > <r.atwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Okay this is 'something' cause it is really peripheral, but > I thought > >some folks here might like this. My friend Alex sent this along to > >another list I'm on. I think he runs the web site ;-0 > > > > > >Robert > > > > > >**** > >Hi, > > > >A new website: > > http://instructionset.org/ > > > >The idea is that every month some instructions appear and > passersby add > >their implementations in code. > >Please let me know of bugs / omissions / ideas! > >cheers, > >alex > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Something mailing list > >Something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/something > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Something mailing list > Something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/something >