Yes, I am. That's how I've come upon these things I've been sending. I
agree that the presentation is missing the research. Either it wasn't
appropriate for the kind of presentation that was done or the research
doesn't exist. These are things I'm looking at: where are the holes in
the research?
-Steven
Carol Townsend wrote:
Absolutely good points.
Perhaps a quick perusal of recent edu-literature (googled??) might
come up with good research. I haven't taken the time lately - anyone
working on the masters or doc soon???
:)
Carol
On 6/20/06, William M. Reed <wreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The only problem with this presentation from SET is that it doesn't
provide any references to document it's claims, other than anecdotal
evidence. I agree with Dr. Falco's points and position, but that may
not convince a skeptic who wants to know, "Where's the research to
back up your claims?"
Bill
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
William M. Reed
St. Joseph Montessori School
933 Hamlet St.
Columbus, OH 43201
614-291-8601
wreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Jun 19, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Steven Greenstein wrote:
> From the makers of SET, so a lot of it translates across all games:
>
> http://www.setgame.com/downloads/
> role_of_board_games_ascd_march_2001.pdf
>
> --
> You gotta put down the ducky if you wanna play the saxophone.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Edu mailing list
> Edu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/edu
_______________________________________________
Edu mailing list
Edu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/edu
_______________________________________________
Edu mailing list
Edu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/edu
--
You gotta put down the ducky if you wanna play the saxophone.