I've moved the article over to BGG: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/305020 --- On Tue 03/25, Ryan Hackel < deeplogic@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote: From: Ryan Hackel [mailto: deeplogic@xxxxxxxxxx] To: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: I_Webb@xxxxxxx Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:26:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fluxx] Fluxx Science, part 2 Hey, gang! Here's a sneak peek from your Friendly Neighborhood Fluxx Scientist.Two years ago, I published the results of a Fluxx science experiment here: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/105929Well, based on the response from that study, I have conducted another experiment, a sequel. It took much longer to do this one, both in playing 200 more games of Fluxx, and in writing up the results. I have temporarily tacked my report on the Rabbit Wiki:http://rabbits.continuation.org/wiki/User:Cerulean/FluxxExp2You Fluxx fans are getting the first look at the results. Please look this article over for editorial oversights and clarifications. Once it looks ready to go, I'm transferring it to BoardGameGeek.---Ryan Hackel_______________________________________________Join Excite! - http://www.excite.comThe most personalized portal on the Web!_______________________________________________Fluxx mailing listFluxx@lists.looneylabs.comhttp://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/fluxx _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!