I agree, because, in THAT case, 2 would get BOTH the rich AND the poor bonus. We can't have that, because the card does not read 'Middle-Class Double-Bonus'. But that's a nice idea for a card, too. Middle Class Bonus rule: "If you don't have the greatest OR the least number of Keepers in play, then you may draw one extra card. Disregard this rule if there are only two people playing." If it said "more than any single person", I could understand, but I always understood the card as being "more than everyone else playing", as Billy did. On 3/25/07, Billy Brahma <billybrahma@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sounds like asking the definition of the word "know" (Dick Cheney) or the definition of the word "is" (Clinton)... The card reads more or less than anyone else. Anyone 2 is more than 1 and less than 3.. only 1 would get the poor bonus... he has less than anyone... only 3 would get the rich... he has more than anyone.. 2 doesn't get anything... he doesn't qualify by anyone...