I like the idea, and also like that one could stymie the game temporarily by playing two conflicting goals (e.g. Peace (No War) & War And Death)... so someone will have to throw in a new nonconflicting goal for anyone to have a chance to win. -Ankhst > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on lists.looneylabs.com > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 > X-Original-To: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivered-To: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > X-Apparently-To: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > x-mailwall-from: Mhargreaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > x-mailwall-procid: 45710906 > Importance: normal > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:32:33 -0000 > From: "Mike Hargreaves" <Mhargreaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > X-MW-Processed: Zmx1eHhAbGlzdHMubG9vbmV5bGFicy5jb206OmN2Og== > X-Original-Rcpt: fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Fluxx] Twin Agenda > X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 > X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.46066 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > > Recently had a game of Fluxx where the Double Agenda card was in play, > and two goals, The appliances + Toast. In one turn I managed to get a > win on both agenda's. I'm not just looking to stroke my ego here, no I'm > looking to share my idea for a new card > > NEW RULE - Twin Agenda > [Picture of a goal cards with the standard +1] > This rule goes into effect as soon as you play it. Place this card face > up in the center of the table. Discard it when a newer rule contradicts > it. > > The current goal limit is increased by 1. After the current goal limit > is reached whoever plays a new Goal (or causes this card to be > discarded) must which of the current Goals to discard. > You win only if you satisfy all Goals. > > > I think this might make a case for changing the Double Agenda wording, > but I accept that in the interests of simplicity that some may argue it > is worth leaving alone. Also I'm conscious I've just created a new > "limit" which should be effected by the No More Limits card. > > Let me hear your thoughts good people. > > > Mike Hargreaves > Multimedia Developer > BMS World Mission > http://www.bmsworldmission.org > _______________________________________________ > Fluxx mailing list > Fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/fluxx