Interesting. I'll accept it as a middle ground. Although I agree with Doug that the best solution would be if all mail programs had a reply-to-list command (and all list programs added the same header such that it could work reliably). Then I could reply to you personally, the list, or both with out having any extra typing or deleting. But since neither gmail or thunderbird seem to have a 'reply-to-list' function, I'll just have to dream. But yes, adding to the reply-to, instead of clobbering seems safer to me (although it also probab/y means more duplicate emails for me....) -Tim On 6/8/05, Christopher Hickman <tophu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > But the "new" Reply-To munging simply *adds* the list reply address to > whatever your original message had in the Reply-To. > > Isn't that the best of both worlds? I simply clicked Reply in my mail > client, and it created this reply to both the list and to you. You are > happy and I am happy. > > Let's all rejoice and move on. :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeks-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:geeks-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Seiger > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:43 PM > To: Rabbits Discussion List; geeks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Geeks] Re: [Rabbits] List problem > > Since I am one of the people who uses Reply-to to attempt to re-direct > replies through my one permanent re-directing address, I would like to > see reply-to munging stop. > But I also accept that it has become a defacto standard that isn't > likely to change. > Also, I think it's time this discussing migrates to the geeks list. > > -Tim > _______________________________________________ > Geeks mailing list > Geeks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/geeks > > >