Including Ryan's, 16 ballots makes it 2 ballots for each game - seems a
decent (if modest) goal for participation . . .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Hackel" <deeplogic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Icehouse] Winter 2008 IGDC Rankings!
Where'd my ballot go?
--- On Tue 02/19, David Artman < david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
From: David Artman [mailto: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:32:05 -0700
Subject: [Icehouse] Winter 2008 IGDC Rankings!
OK, folks, I've got the Winter 2008 IGDC Rankings in a Google
call upon the Dark Masters of Arcana, to format those rankings andshove
them through the Obscure Engine of
Masters, please (a) get some kind of corroboration of the results(at least
two independent formattings and runs through the script?) and(b) post the
Final Rankings to this list. I will then update the IGDCPage (and it's
mirror, "archive" page); and we can begin to hammer thedesigners with
feedback.I, for one, am glad there was a last-minute rally and we got a
few morerankings. 15 ballots for 8 games isn't that bad, compared to past
IGDCs.I think, in fact, that I will stick with the Summer/Winter cycle
fornow, because it seems that we're doing as well as ever and, as
Avrisaid, we gotta be consistent if we want to foster routine
participation.And folks... once
you've worked out your feedback and finalized games,let's get them to
Existing, WCIP?, and BGG! Pimp your coolness!Then... ponder the next
competition's restriction (if
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Icehouse mailing list