I agree that it makes sense to just name the winner and the runner-up. I wasn't a judge in this contest and I'm new to the list, so I'm not sure my opinion carries any weight, but there it is. -Jason On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Jorge Arroyo <trozo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > We should make a decision about this, as if we're going to do it, the > sooner we change the infoboxes on the wiki, the better. So far from what I > read on the other threads at least 3 people (including me) agree with this. > Is there anyone that feels this is a bad decision? > > Basically, I think that with such a low number of votes, and seeing how > small changes affect the final order a lot, why not just use the votes to > get a winner and a runner up. This way the rest of the games are not marked > for life (especially the ones on the bottom) when they might just be really > good games. I don't think either Martian Gunslingers or Virus Fight deserve > this stigma when MG was penalized for beign a 1house game and being hard to > play without a custom deck and Virus Fight was the only game that actually > beat the winner of the contest in the individual pairings.