On Oct 24, 2007, at 11:47 AM, David Artman wrote:
Ok, that's a bit wild sounding... but there's at least five new  
(probably) spambot accounts on the Rabbit wiki, and they are doing  
their thing (which I bet are preliminary tests) of adding a  
nonsense word to the start of random pages. They have also  
successfully created new pages and
The mass deletions are soon to come.
Admins--could you get some kind of ReCaptcha plug-in running? Or  
better still, switch it to Admin approval for new members? We  
aren't Wikipedia; we can manage to gateway the site with minimal  
effort and not render it "unsocial" or "insular." That how the  
Rabbit Roster worked, right?
As suggested, I've added the reCAPTCHA plugin. I've done some basic  
testing, and it appears to work; the default configuration seems  
pretty reasonable, so I've left it at that. I've elected not to  
require admin approval for accounts yet, since I think that will take  
more time to set up and work out, and I think that CAPTCHAs will get  
us the best payoff for time invested.
This means that you'll have to enter a CAPTCHA (that is, type some  
words shown in an image) any time you want to create an account or  
add a URL to a page, or if you provide the wrong password when trying  
to log in. Could a few users test this out, by trying to add some  
URLs, while logged in and while logged out, to the Sandbox page, to  
make sure it brings up a CAPTCHA in the right circumstances?
Right now the configuration is that if anyone but an admin tries to  
add a URL it prompts for a CAPTCHA. I could also change it to allow  
any registered user to add URLs unhindered, since registering is  
already protected by a CAPTCHA. Or, I could create a new group of  
trusted users, who are allowed to add URLs but who aren't admins. Or  
I could leave it as is. Anyone have any preferences?
Thanks to David Artman for bringing this to my attention (I haven't  
been checking the recent changes quite as often as I should), and  
thanks to Melissa for being prompt about blocking the user accounts  
(sadly, it is more trouble than it's worth to actually delete user  
accounts in MediaWiki).