OK I surrender, what's up with the 'fF'? -Ankhst > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on lists.looneylabs.com > X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: nil > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 > X-Original-To: something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivered-To: something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ws3IFSmbCP4c+aT41kPwKoYmFW7VgNzw/QYJfXh8Nl0=; b=BOL8OS59J5OWkT6kjh1qaLqdqBAGPLIx7Zw4Gcrb7uoCsEJVlS5j3qwj/rwnp1hKHU ChNpwVYIcO1BMaG93tT/lPh2M/gwLCHQh3dnBswJClKGfPbH2tslBCNb6ZjDEOsqz2CV wpqIXBe4qiFWom9AEx8n0rpFwgVwYJjSALuoY= > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=R53angOmDaAmq8GqYyCHOMsCqWem13XWpUPBZMsCjfnoVq04eD77FO6jU1yOvTp1Vd jWiyRgatnYyf5dtCvrVvKs+po9ZHgWmU/18SeBpxl/p+zdeTjxwXApbqZsjGTi/xXn9M z28P+P43DGKXgTNtPCjy4a4WmnvNxkBObfNpI= > Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:15:08 -0400 > From: "S Myers" <iamthecheeze@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Wunderland.Com Discussion List" <something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Something] 1000 Blank White Cards > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA > X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 > X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.1472 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.10 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS > > I havent been able to convince anyone I know to try a proper game of > it. Usually the response is something like: "so we scribble out a > bunch of things like 'draw 5, play 30' or something and maybe some > dumb cards just to spite people we don't like... ? that's it? that's > pretty goofy. let's just play fFluxx. same effect, none of the > effort, and i tsill get to steal all your keepers." > > It seems like 1000BWC works best with a bunch of people who have an > ever growing deck of cards amongst them, laden with inside jokes and > fFunny art and anecdotes. Which is great! But getting such a device > started seems to be the real hurdle here, fFor me. > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Nick Lamicela <nupanick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does anyone else here play 1000 blank white cards? It just occured to me > > that some of you might know about it, since it's really the next step up > > from Fluxx in terms of unpredictability. > > > > -- > > ~nupanick (or other appropriate name) > > > > =================== > > Guvf VF zl jvggl fvtangher. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Something mailing list > > Something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/something > > > > > > > > -- > It's always a long day. > 86400 doesn't fFit into a short. > _______________________________________________ > Something mailing list > Something@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/something