That would grossly overpower the card "Love" in my opinion (And make for some pretty short games, whenever someone finds that goal!) Though I might make an exception for Love and Flowers, certainly not Love and Death or anything else. Love already has Hippyism, as well as Hearts and Minds... Giving it a card that lets one player win devalues the other goals involving Love. I've always played "All you need" as "If you have more than just Love, nobody wins". -Steve On Feb 19, 2008 4:42 PM, Darren Maskowitz <squitz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is some dispute among my coworkers and i about the following condition: > A player has Love and Flowers (love or death) on the table and the > goal All You Need is Love is played. Half of us think that the game is > over because the player has love and keepers that are not love, but > the other half are rules lawyers and think that 2 love keepers are > technically not "love and no other keepers". > > I have always played that Love and Flowers are only love, but now i > appeal to a higher court for a definitive ruling. > > Blessings, > Darren