On 9/28/07, David Artman <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I could also easily provide such a ballot, as PDF or HTML (to be copied > into the e-mail). I think it might be a BIT much to ask folks, to > consider and mark n^2 boxes (where n is the number of games--eight this > time, but could be ten or even twelve next time: 144 decisions?!). > > Should the judging period be longer, perhaps adjusted for the number of > games submitted? This is probably the best (i.e. easiest to implement) way to ago about it. Two games per week seems like a reasonable rule of thumb in this case. (Or maybe more would be better, given the number of incomplete ballots.) -- - |) () /\/