Looney Labs Icehouse Mailing list Archive

RE: [Icehouse] Icehouse game book

  • FromDavid Artman <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • DateThu, 21 Feb 2008 11:51:04 -0700
> From: Doug Orleans <dougorleans@xxxxxxxxx>
> I'm confused.  Why do you need anything at all from Looney Labs?  If
> you get all the designers' permissions, you can just publish the book
> yourself.  I don't even think the term "Icehouse" is trademarked.

1) I am not too sure of that... and I wouldn't use their imprint or
graphics without them profiting anyway, copyright or not.

2) If I charge anything above production costs, there's profit. Profit
goes to someone (one check recipient). I didn't want to become a
clearinghouse for micro-payment distribution to designers (who,
actually, had to put a CC license on their games to be considered
anyway, if you recall). Thus, I can not profit. Bit the Looneys could,
and I'd be pleased if their invention (Icehouse) gained then a few bucks
per printed POD book.

3) I am well-aware that I can release my own product--or my own
compilation of games I design--for profit or whatever. In fact, if I
ever get Stacktors! balanced and finished (*sigh*) I have every
intention of releasing it as a single-sheet, laminated product (with a
rules booklet, if necessary). But a compilation book is different; it
has several--or rather, no--"owners."

That said, you are probably right from a legal standpoint. But I'd
prefer to put my "David Artman, Editor" mark on a book that is right
from my perspective of fairness, which means we designers push our CC
games' profits back to the Looneys, the better to support future
Icehouse products.
David


Current Thread