Elliott C. Evans writes:
>Yes, that's ambiguous; yes, you need to check in the book.
Yep! :)
>PwP, p. 89:
> > An attacking piece is extraneous if subtracting its value from the
> > total value of the attacking pieces leaves a number that still exceeds
> > the value of the defensive piece.
That works.
--
Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\ _,,,--,,_ ,)
--^-- "Did you know, if you increment enough, you /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;'
/\\ get an extra digit?" "I knew," weeps Six. |,4- ) )-,_ ) /\
/-\\\ "We knew. But we had forgotten." '---''(_/--' (_/-'