<nitpick size=smaller> But I thought that the 3 peak won't "fully nest" properly in a 1. It'll rattle, IIRC. (Remember the whole "the peak angles actually change at each new pip count" thread months ago?) </nitpick> It's definitely faster to cut down just the 3, though, for a quick set of ZPIPs to go with the 1s and 2s. David > From: "Don Sheldon" <don.sheldon@xxxxxxxxx> > On 8/15/07, Christopher Hickman <tophu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > And an extra black stash is a great opportunity to make a pocket stash > > > (saw down each mid to one size "smaller": 0-pips, 1-pip, 2-pips) > > Now there's an idea! > (Save yourself the trouble and only saw your 3s down to 0s rather than > your 3s to 2s, your 2s to 1s and your 1s to 0s. The advantages to > this are numerous and should be obvious.)