> From: "Jorge Arroyo" <trozo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Let me apologize: my example is not the best one because in your game the > stacking properties are used. It could be played with one set but would be > unconfortable... Really? I can't see how... it takes 23 pyramids, 8 more than are in a set. > is what I posted: "Id vote for a XHOUSE type of restriction, specifically I > think 1HOUSE would be best, but I'd go with the 3HOUSE limit. Also, I think > more games that make creative use of the Martian Coasters are needed, so > those two restrictions are what I'd vote for... > --Maka<http://www.icehousegames.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Maka>19:39, > 27 October 2007 (EDT)" Ah, OK, sorry. Didn't know you are "Maka". But... uh, you voted for (some form of) xHOUSE restriction, so...? > I'm sorry you have so very little patience, but that is not a reason to stop > discussing something... I think "discussion" ended about the third or fourth repetition of the reasons for the restriction. Further, I think I have shown a lot of patience, given how much time I've expended explaining this to one person (I wonder how much patience the list, in general, has for this continuing). *I'm* sorry you find my effort and the patience it required (and used up) to be "so very little." Good luck in the IGDC; David