On 10/18/07, David Artman <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The point about server impact, however, has we thinking further. There > was a little inkling--a small quiet voice in my head--when I was posting > my last post that went along the lines of "Hmmm... so a call to my user > page will result in about fifteen server-side 'includes,' in addition to > the specific template and icon downloaded to my browser." Do any of the > more code-savvy Rabbits know how much of an impact a single > instantiation causes, when an HTML page has to call another (hidden) > page to process an include? Mediawiki does A LOT of caching and other such time saving techniques. I wouldn't worry about it. Just don't change the the most basic template and then check to see if it propogated to everywhere more than once every five minutes or so ;) -- - |) () /\/