I am certain that the intention is: if no one has Zombies, nothing gets
eaten. (Correct me if I'm wrong!)
This shows the difficulty of writing game rules. It probably didn't occur
to them to that this could be a question. A future printing could
explicitly address this on the card.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Hickman" <tophu@xxxxxxx>
To: <fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: [Fluxx] Eaten by Zero Zombies?
Eaten By Zombies says that the player with the most zombies loses a
keeper, and if it is a tie, ALL the players with the most zombies lose
one. What if every player has the most zombies, and the greatest number
of zombies is zero?
As written, it seems that everybody loses a keeper, but it sure feels
wrong for everybody to have a keeper eaten by zombies that don't exist.
Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Fluxx mailing list
Fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/fluxx