Lisa Paul (paullisa@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> I think that Dig is clearer now. We ignored the "top piece moves to
> bottom" dig-in-place option; I think we thought it was just a
> clarification of how one digs *not* in place..
Aaah!. That is meant.
What about rewording the last DIG sentence to
"Alternatively the topmost piece of a stack moves to the bottom"?
Bye,
Simon
--
simon@xxxxxxxx http://simon.budig.de/