On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:42:13 -0700, David Artman wrote: > So I will leave it to y'all: IF you care, reply with a YES or a NO to > extending to October 1st. I vote no. I've got feedback on the games that I'd like to share before I lose it, (yes, I'm too lazy to type it up just to save it). Plus, judges and designers that put in hard work on time deserve to get rewarded by hearing the results at the expected time. There is one more game I was really hoping to get to, but if I haven't yet, then maybe there was a reason, (name didn't make it stand out? rules seemed too overwhelming at first glance? didn't sound as fun as other options from reading the rules?). But the implicit two-day extension does give me room for that anyway. And finally, deadlines only work if you stick to them. Extending the deadline now sets a bad precedent for future competitions if you want to encourage people to participate early. 36 submitted votes actually sounds pretty good to me. Any idea how that compares to previous contests? It definitely doesn't sound so small that there's a need to go begging for more votes anywhere. -Carl
Attachment:
pgptlmH6r3COp.pgp
Description: PGP signature