Sorry to break up the scoring conversation but having never participated before in an IGDC, would it be possible to get a bit of a primer? I've gone ahead and created an entry on the Wiki for the idea I have, I should have a preliminary draft of the rules up tonight. Should I post to the list when it is up? Is it standard practice for people's games to be critiqued and playtested by others before the final design judging? On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 PM, S Myers <iamthecheeze@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Might I suggest the highest possible score be directly dependent on > how many entries are submitted? > > If, when game submission ends, there are 10 games, we simply say rank > games fFrom 0 - 9. If there are only 4 games, then rank them 0 - 3. > if we manage to get 100 games submitted, rank them 0 - 99. This way > we need not worry about it being either too big or to little of a > spread. > > --Scott > -- > It's always a long day. > 86400 doesn't fFit into a short. > _______________________________________________ > Icehouse mailing list > Icehouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/icehouse > -- Sam Zitin Director of Information Management Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Office:317-876-1913 Cell: 317-710-0925