Looney Labs Icehouse Mailing list Archive

Re: [Icehouse] IGDC Winter 2009?

  • FromChristopher Hickman <tophu@xxxxxxx>
  • DateTue, 17 Mar 2009 14:59:08 -0400
On Tuesday, March 17, 2009, at 12:49PM, "David Artman" <david.artman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Of course, I can go with 0 - 20, also--decent range (can borrow the BGG
>qualifiers, just x2) to avoid ties but not such a huge range as to make the
>values arbitrary (i.e. what make an 88 better than an 85?).

Like this:

   * 18 - 19: Outstanding. Always want to play and expect this will never change.
   * 16 - 17: Excellent game. Always want to play it.
   * 14 - 15: Very good game. I like to play. Probably I'll suggest it and will never turn down a game.
   * 12 - 13: Good game, usually willing to play.
   * 10 - 11: Ok game, some fun or challenge at least, will play sporadically if in the right mood.
   * 08 - 09: Average game, slightly boring, take it or leave it.
   * 06 - 07: Not so good, it doesn't get me but could be talked into it on occasion.
   * 04 - 05: Likely won't play this again although could be convinced. Bad.
   * 02 - 03: Extremely annoying game, won't play this ever again.
   * 00 - 01: Defies description of a game. You won't catch me dead playing this. Clearly broken.