On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Dale Sheldon <dales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, David Artman wrote: >> So being scored at all is a tie-breaker? > We could skip the tie-breaker and say equal scores means it's truly tied. No no, I like using the number of votes as a tie breaker. The goal is to get people to play your games. Heck, I would be willing to say "the game with the most plays is the winner over-all" -- except that isn't very practical. If you bring me a game which seems nice but is utterly incomprehensible in how to play it and we all kick it aside, that does nobody any good. -- It's always a long day. 86400 doesn't fFit into a short.