Flooding? You must lead a very sheltered life... :-P (PS - also: Inbox? You might want to research "folders" [or "Labels"] and "Filters") On 5 August 2011 08:30, David Artman <david.artman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pretty please, with sugar on top? Stop flooding my inbox, ok? The four or > five of you who still care have each others emails, there's the geeks list, > there's the (ignorable) forums. Do I have to unsubscribe to be rid of these > two gyring threads? > > It would at least be somewhat interesting if the critics of the rule > verbiage offered a rewrite that fixed the perceived (by 1%) problem. The > original post has been answered, in (at last count) three distinct ways: > it's a shitty bn that no one would ever guess and would make the students > quit (master loses); it can be reduced to a valid, non-external rule with > ~120,000 clauses (taking literally hours to even state); and the koan > isolation rule is only confused by the most pedantic mastication of the game > text, which is un-Zen and against the obvious spirit of the game: pleasure > through collaborative realization, not gamist 'accomplishment'. > > Maybe y'all should switch to Martian Chess...? > > Please find a venue where the participant to audience ratio isn't quite so > miniscule, OK? > David > > _______________________________________________ > Icehouse mailing list > Icehouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/icehouse > >