Looney Labs Icehouse Mailing list Archive

RE: [Icehouse] Re: two Treehouse questions

  • From"Christopher Hickman" <tophu@xxxxxxx>
  • DateThu, 4 May 2006 12:17:14 -0400
Obviously, the initial tree should be annotated like this:

<stack><pyramid size="1" orientation="upright"/><pyramid size="2"
orientation="upright"/><pyramid size="3" orientation="upright"/></stack>

Duh. ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: icehouse-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icehouse-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Lentczner
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 9:53 AM
To: Icehouse Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Icehouse] Re: two Treehouse questions

On May 3, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Eric Wald wrote:

> I agree.  The only thing I would do to improve it is to use slashes
> instead of commas, to make the stacks explicit.
>            Initial Tree:  ^1/2/3
>            A Nest:        ^3/2/1

Okay, I see where commas may be confused as delimiters between places  
on the line rather than pieces in the stack.  BUT, the typographer in  
me can't abide slashes inter-mixed with digits: they make the numbers  
harder to read (as the slash takes up lots of ink, and is similar to  
many of the number glyphs...)

Let's see...

	dashes:  ^1-2-3  ^3-2-1
	pluses:  ^1+2+3  ^3+2+1
	colons:  ^1:2:3  ^3:2:1
	tildes:  ^1~2~3  ^3~2~1
	quotes:  ^1'2'3  ^3'2'1
	periods: ^1.2.3  ^3.2.1
	parens:  ^1(2(3  ^3(2(1
	or even: ^1(2(3)) ^3(2(1))
Of these, I like pluses both typographically and for the semantic  
"and".  The parenthesis has a sort of nice stacking feel to it but  
seems overly heavy, and more general purpose than needed.  (Plus, if  
you don't include the closers, then all the digits look like they're  

So, I vote for the plus sign as separator between pieces in a stack.

Now, should I submit this standard to the IETF, ISO, ANSI, ECMA, or  
all four?  I'm reserving the upcoming Treehouse+XML format for W3C  

	- Mark

Mark Lentczner

Icehouse mailing list