Yeah. I like the idea of The Computer and I was excited to put it in my deck, but it is a bit too powerful. I mean, to the point that whoever got The Computer usually won, and I had to add a new Action (Power Outage) to make it easier to deal with (it trashes all appliances). On Thursday, March 13, 2008, at 03:45PM, "Darren Maskowitz" <squitz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >X=X+1 (Inflation for you with 3.1) is another of the cards i like, but >it compounds the problem i have with the computer. Now the persom with >the computer has +2 to everything, in addition to the +1 from X=X+1. >When all that is out are the basic rules and X=X+1 the guy with the >computer is drawing and playing 4, while everyone else is at 2. > >On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Doug Orleans <dougorleans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Christopher Onstad writes: >> > As for dislike, I think my least favorite card of all is the Inflation >> > rule. I like the concept of it, but in most games it slows games down as >> > everybody stops and does math. Not just figuring out what to draw and play, >> > but then checking their cards of numerals. >> >> I think it's my favorite. It's a way to simultaneously increase the >> Draw, Play, and Limit rules, all of which reduce the luck factor (slightly). >> And it's not mutually exclusive with anything else, so it will stick >> around until someone chooses to trash it. >> >> --dougorleans@xxxxxxxxx >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fluxx mailing list >> Fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/fluxx >> >_______________________________________________ >Fluxx mailing list >Fluxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/fluxx > >