>> I'll second that. How about $2. :) > >Sounds good to me. :) But it would still have to be profitable for >the Looneys at whatever price point they would hypothetically set. >$2.50 sounds more realistic; Yeah, my $2 comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek, since five trios at two bucks means ten dollars, and if they would do that it would pretty much make all our bitching moot, eh?