On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, David Artman wrote:
From: Doug Orleans <dougorleans@xxxxxxxxx>
I don't think it's a good idea to change the rules after a bunch of
people have voted. But if so, you should announce that and let people
re-vote with the new rules if they want to.
I'm not changing the rules; I am trying to properly interpret a judge's
clear, ranked ballot. While we've been discussing this, the judge HAS
confirmed that this was intended:
1) AAA
2) BBB
8 (yes, eight)) CCC
To decrease confusion for next time, I recommend you stop asking for
numbers. This question wouldn't have arisen if the ballot had looked like
AAA
BBB
CCC
The script doesn't accept numbers, so it misleads voters to imply that the
numbers are meaningful.
Or else insist that the numbers are just row numbers, from 1 to the number
of rows. Blank rows will be ignored, as they're meaningless.
--Z
--
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
You don't become a tyranny by committing torture. If you plan for torture,
argue in favor of torture, set up legal justifications for torturing
someday, then the moral rot has *already* set in.