David Artman writes: > > From: Doug Orleans <dougorleans@xxxxxxxxx> > > I don't think it's a good idea to change the rules after a bunch of > > people have voted. But if so, you should announce that and let people > > re-vote with the new rules if they want to. > > I'm not changing the rules; I am trying to properly interpret a judge's > clear, ranked ballot. While we've been discussing this, the judge HAS > confirmed that this was intended: > 1) AAA > 2) BBB > 8 (yes, eight)) CCC That is not a valid ballot by the rules. --dougorleans@xxxxxxxxx