It's only bad design if he didn't intend for HL0 to be "immune" to X=X+1 Maybe in 4.0, HL0 could be renamed to "No Cards For You!" ;-) -Ankhst > Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:52:23 PM, you wrote: > > JK> Timothy Hunt writes: > >>It's because it's such an easy mistake to make that it happens so often. > > JK> This is true, but it's also a sign of bad design. We've always > JK> assumed that Hand Limit 0 said "you cannot hold more than 0" cards, > JK> because the other hand limits are worded this way, and it's something > JK> of an unpleasant surprise to learn that it isn't. > > > I don't think that is a sign of bad design; it's simply a sign of > Andy's inability to predict the future. It would only be bad design if > he had already been planning an X=X+1 card at the time he designed the > Hand Limit 0 card. "You cannot hold more than 0 cards" would be a > rather unnatural wording. > > _______________________________________________ > Rabbits mailing list > Rabbits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.looneylabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rabbits