Eric Haas writes:
>Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:52:23 PM, you wrote:
>JK> Timothy Hunt writes:
>>>It's because it's such an easy mistake to make that it happens so often.
>JK> This is true, but it's also a sign of bad design.
>I don't think that is a sign of bad design; it's simply a sign of
>Andy's inability to predict the future.
Remember, many, many cards were reworded to make them work with X=X+1.
Since Hand Limit 0 was not reworded, this is either a mistake (should
have renamed the card if it was intended not to work with Inflation)
or a mistake (should have reworded). Keeping the name the same while
keeping the text non-inflatable just creates misplays.
--
Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\ _,,,--,,_ ,)
--^-- "Did you know, if you increment enough, you /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;'
/\\ get an extra digit?" "I knew," weeps Six. |,4- ) )-,_ ) /\
/-\\\ "We knew. But we had forgotten." '---''(_/--' (_/-'