Looney Labs Rabbits Mailing list Archive

Re: Re[2]: [Rabbits] [Fluxx] Question for Ask Andy

  • FromJoshua Kronengold <mneme@xxxxxx>
  • DateThu, 22 Mar 2007 09:59:19 -0500
Eric Haas writes:
>Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:52:23 PM, you wrote:
>JK> Timothy Hunt writes:
>>>It's because it's such an easy mistake to make that it happens so often.
>JK> This is true, but it's also a sign of bad design.
>I don't think that is a sign of bad design; it's simply a sign of
>Andy's inability to predict the future.

Remember, many, many cards were reworded to make them work with X=X+1.

Since Hand Limit 0 was not reworded, this is either a mistake (should
have renamed the card if it was intended not to work with Inflation)
or a mistake (should have reworded).  Keeping the name the same while
keeping the text non-inflatable just creates misplays.

       Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\      _,,,--,,_  ,)
--^--   "Did you know, if you increment enough, you   /,`.-'`'   -,  ;-;;'
 /\\    get an extra digit?"  "I knew," weeps Six.    |,4-  ) )-,_ ) /\     
/-\\\   "We knew. But we had forgotten."	     '---''(_/--' (_/-'