Eric Haas writes: >Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:52:23 PM, you wrote: >JK> Timothy Hunt writes: >>>It's because it's such an easy mistake to make that it happens so often. >JK> This is true, but it's also a sign of bad design. >I don't think that is a sign of bad design; it's simply a sign of >Andy's inability to predict the future. Remember, many, many cards were reworded to make them work with X=X+1. Since Hand Limit 0 was not reworded, this is either a mistake (should have renamed the card if it was intended not to work with Inflation) or a mistake (should have reworded). Keeping the name the same while keeping the text non-inflatable just creates misplays. -- Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\ _,,,--,,_ ,) --^-- "Did you know, if you increment enough, you /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;' /\\ get an extra digit?" "I knew," weeps Six. |,4- ) )-,_ ) /\ /-\\\ "We knew. But we had forgotten." '---''(_/--' (_/-'