Marc Hartstein writes:
>4. As I mentioned above, making a convention a Category is somewhat
>unintuitive. While I think it will probably have the desired behavior,
>it feels a bit kludgy to me. It could just be an issue of nomenclature,
>though.
One thing here -- Wiki allows fairly hefty includes (ie, functions) --
including ones that add categories to a page. So this could be
structured not as manually adding [[Category:Cons:Balticon]] to your
page, but instead adding [[Con|Balticon|balticon's url]] which would
add the balticon image, the balticon url, etc, in some nice pretty
form -- as well as also adding you to the Category:Con:Balticon page
as a side effect. In theory, this could involve javascript that let
you click on the icon to add it to your own User page -- though I'm
not sure we want to Go There.
--
Joshua Kronengold (mneme@(io.com, labcats.org)) |\ _,,,--,,_ ,)
--^-- "Did you know, if you increment enough, you /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;'
/\\ get an extra digit?" "I knew," weeps Six. |,4- ) )-,_ ) /\
/-\\\ "We knew. But we had forgotten." '---''(_/--' (_/-'