Scott S. wrote: > In any case, I read on their site that their cards (standard > playing cards) come in 3.5x2.5 (too big for Fluxx) and 3.5x2.375. > However, my tape measure shows that Fluxx cards measure in at 3.5 > (just under actually)x2.25. So, how do they stack up against > Fluxx cards size wise? Is there a large noticeable difference > between the size of the cards? Those measurements are all accurate. There is a noticeable size difference between the Plaincards I have and the Fluxx 3.0 deck I have. For printing custom Fluxx cards, I'd either run Blanxx through the printer on a carrier sheet, or use the sticker method. Avery has full-sheet clear clear labels now, which should be handy for adding text to a Blanxx card. Plaincards aren't really useful for adding cards to an existing game. They're mostly sueful for entire custom decks. > On their site it does say that they work fine through most modern > printers, but they say some of the older printers have a sharp > turn which may cause the cards to separate (what older means in > terms of computers, I can't say for certain). As well, apparently > there have been some complaints about the HP all-in-ones. I happen > to have one of those, so I'm asking for more information myself. I mostly just use my Canon inkjet, which has a fairly straight paper path, so I can't really say. I guess I could run a test with the laser printer that has a 180 degree bend in the path and see what happens... -- Elliott C. "Eeyore" Evans eeyore@xxxxxxxx