On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Christopher Hickman <tophu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > It doesn't matter that you can find a case where one doesn't do anything. > In a theoretical case where Hand Limit 1 and Hand Limit 3 are both in play > and I apply the HL1 by discarding down to 1, the HL3 then doesn't do > anything. That doesn't mean they both get to stay in play. > Here's Andy's explanation from the FAQ: > Sorry, my point wasn't clear. Tobias' assertion was that there was no conflict, and that a 3 always ended up as a 6, and therefore there was no need to say one contradicted the other. I was demonstrating a way where a 3 ended up as a 4, and therefore his assertion wasn't true. There is a potential conflict, and that's why Andy ruled the way he did. Timothy