On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:30:39 -0700, David Artman wrote: > Dude, go for it! Your class might have a significant influence on the > final rankings (as they outnumber the rankings that I currently have!); > but I have no objection to that whatsoever. [snip several good points---full agreement from me] > Last (procedural) point: who thinks it should be renamed to the > "IceHOUSE Game Design Competition," which is how Andy is referring to it > (it's been "Ice Game Design Competition" as long as I have known about > it). I can redirect the page, so current links won't break or anything. > Thoughts? Sounds good to me. I haven't know about the competition for long, but I had always assumed it was the Icehouse Game Design Competition anyway. "Ice Game" seems far too vague to me. -Carl
Attachment:
pgpN2dDztxjmy.pgp
Description: PGP signature